OMOA WIRELESS, S. DER. L. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
| 1:2006cv00148 |
| February 13, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| Durham Office |
| RUSSELL A. ELIASON |
| WILLIAM L. OSTEEN |
| Taxes |
| Actions affecting property on which United States had lien |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
188
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE WILLIAM L. OSTEEN JR. on 08/11/2010, that the United States' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 140 ) is GRANTED, and it is FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Primavera's Motion for Summary Judgment (D oc. 134 ) is DENIED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Motion for Entry of Consent Judgment by the U.S. and OMOA's (Doc. 129 ) is GRANTED. Finally, it is FURTHER ORDERED that OMOA's Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim (Doc. 139 ) is D ISMISSED AS MOOT. The United States is directed to submit a judgment prepared in accordance with the terms of this order and including legal descriptions of the relevant property within ten (10) days of the entry of this order. A copy of the United States' proposed judgment shall be provided to all counsel prior to submission to this court. (Taylor, Abby)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: OMOA WIRELESS, S. DER. L. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
