ROBINSON v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
Case Number: 1:2006cv00749
Filed: September 6, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: Durham Office
Presiding Judge: JAMES A. BEATY
Presiding Judge: RUSSELL A. ELIASON
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION: ORDERED that in forma pauperis status be granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation. ORDERED that within twenty (20) days from the date of this Order plaintiff make an initial filing fee payment o f $.17 and return the Consent to Collection form. Failure to comply with this Order will lead to dismissal of the complaint. RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) for being frivolous or malicious or for fa iling to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, as well as for seeking monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. re 2 Complaint filed by BRENT A. ROBINSON.Objections to R&R due by 9/28/2006. Signed by Magistrate Judge RUSSELL A. ELIASON on 9/8/06. (Butler, Carol)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ROBINSON v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?