ASHE v. CULPEPPER
Petitioner: MASON P. ASHE
Respondent: DAUNTE CULPEPPER
Mediator: JONATHAN R. HARKAVY
Case Number: 1:2007cv00048
Filed: January 19, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: Durham Office
County: Forsyth
Presiding Judge: JAMES A. BEATY
Presiding Judge: RUSSELL A. ELIASON
Nature of Suit: Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Cause of Action: 09 U.S.C. ยง 0009 Motion to Confirm Arbitration
Jury Demanded By: None
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ASHE v. CULPEPPER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DAUNTE CULPEPPER
Represented By: REBECCA H. MILLER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MASON P. ASHE
Represented By: MICHAEL DAVID PHILLIPS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Mediator: JONATHAN R. HARKAVY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?