LOVE v. COMMISSIONER

LOVE v. COMMISSIONER

Plaintiff:	EMMA KATHY LOVE
Defendant:	OF SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSIONER
Case Number:	1:2007cv00648
Filed:	August 27, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office:	Durham Office
County:	Davidson
Presiding Judge:	JAMES A. BEATY
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 10, 2014	Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 04/10/2014 as set out herein. RECOMMENDED that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability be affirmed, that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry 18 ) be denied, that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket Entry 20 ) be granted, and that this action be dismissed.(Taylor, Abby)
August 26, 2011	Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION - MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE WALLACE W. DIXON on 08/26/2011. For the foregoing reasons, the decision of the Commissioner is supported by substantial evidence; and the correct legal principles were appli ed. Therefore, IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Commissioner's decision finding disability beginning on January 29, 2007, be AFFIRMED. To this extent, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (docket no. 18 ) seeking a reversal of the Commissioner's decision should be DENIED, Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (docket no. 20 ) should be GRANTED, and this action should be DISMISSED with prejudice.(Taylor, Abby)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 10, 2014

Filing 27 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 04/10/2014 as set out herein. RECOMMENDED that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability be affirmed, that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry 18 ) be denied, that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket Entry 20 ) be granted, and that this action be dismissed.(Taylor, Abby)

August 26, 2011

Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION - MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE WALLACE W. DIXON on 08/26/2011. For the foregoing reasons, the decision of the Commissioner is supported by substantial evidence; and the correct legal principles were appli ed. Therefore, IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Commissioner's decision finding disability beginning on January 29, 2007, be AFFIRMED. To this extent, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (docket no. 18 ) seeking a reversal of the Commissioner's decision should be DENIED, Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (docket no. 20 ) should be GRANTED, and this action should be DISMISSED with prejudice.(Taylor, Abby)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LOVE v. COMMISSIONER
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: EMMA KATHY LOVE
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: OF SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSIONER
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?