MURRAY v. CASH et al
| ADRIAN D. MURRAY |
| A. CASH and UNKNOWN NAMED INSURERS OF A. CASH |
| 1:2008cv00280 |
| April 22, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) Office |
| Scotland |
| UNASSIGNED |
| P. TREVOR SHARP |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
198
ORDER, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 7/11/2013, that for the reasons stated above, Plaintiff's motion to file exhibit under seal (Docket Entry 185 ) is GRANTED as to Docket Entry 189 and pages 1 2-13 of Docket Entry 193 . Further, RECOMMENDED that the court GRANT Defendant's motion to dismiss on the basis of res judicata. (Docket Entry 12.) FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Plaintiffs motion to deny Defendant's request to apply res judicata (Docket Entry 192 ) be DENIED and that Plaintiffs motion for a hearing be DENIED as moot. (Butler, Carol)
|
|
Filing
167
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 5/1/2012. ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Add Defendant(s) and Claims for Relief (Docket Entry 151 ) is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Reply Brief in Referenc e to Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate Judges [sic] Stay Order (Docket Entry 158 ) and the related Sealed Documents (Docket Entry 160 ) are STRICKEN and that Plaintiff's Certificate of Confidentiality Request to File under Seal (Docket Entry 159 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk shall render said Reply Brief (Docket Entry 158 ) and the related Sealed Documents (Docket Entry 160 )inaccessible (save to the Court) both in paper and electronic form. (Butler, Carol)
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE P. TREVOR SHARP on 6/22/2010, recommending that the motion to dismiss filed by Defendants (Docket No. 92 ) be granted in part and denied in part. All claims agains t Defendant Jackson should be dismissed. Plaintiff's Estelle claim against Defendant Cash should be dismissed insofar as it rests upon a claim by Plaintiff that Defendant Cash violated his rights during the time period in which he refused to wea r a special wristband. Plaintiff's Estelle claim against Defendant Cash based upon a claim that Defendant Cash refused to provide dietary snacks to Plaintiff after Plaintiff notified her he would wear a wristband presents factual issues that can not be decided under Rule 12 procedures. That sole claim should survive the motion to dismiss; ordering that the parties may have discovery under the federal rules until October 15, 2010. Any discovery requests must be timely served so that responses are due on or before October 15. Plaintiff's motion for an order regarding Defendants' motion to dismiss (Docket No. 115 ) is DISMISSED as moot. (Daniel, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
