BROADNAX v. BRANDEN
Petitioner: JARVIS DEANGELO BROADNAX
Respondent: JUDY BRANDEN
Case Number: 1:2008cv00411
Filed: June 18, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Rockingham
Presiding Judge: UNASSIGNED
Presiding Judge: RUSSELL A. ELIASON
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OPINION and RECOMMENDATION of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIASON signed by on 12/3/2008 that Respondent's motion to dismiss (Docket No. 3 ) be granted, that the petition (Docket No. 1 ) be dismissed, and that Judgment be entered dismissing this action. (Lee, Lisa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BROADNAX v. BRANDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JARVIS DEANGELO BROADNAX
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: JUDY BRANDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?