MUSTAFA v. BECK

MUSTAFA v. BECK

Petitioner:	WILLIAM ABDULLAH MUSTAFA
Respondent:	THEODIS BECK
Case Number:	1:2008cv00892
Filed:	December 10, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office:	Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County:	Alamance
Presiding Judge:	P. TREVOR SHARP
Presiding Judge:	UNASSIGNED
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 19, 2009	Filing 11 ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR., on 5/19/2009; adopting the Magistrate Judge's rulings (doc. no. 8 ), that Respondent's motion to dismiss (docket no. 4 ) is granted, that the petition (docket no. 1 ) is dismissed, that this action is dismissed, and that finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is denied. (Lloyd, Donna)
April 2, 2009	Filing 8 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION - MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE DONALD P. DIETRICH on 04/02/09, that Respondent's motion to dismiss (Docket No. 4 ) be granted, that the petition (Docket No. 1 ) be dismissed, and that Judgment be entered dismissing this action. (Law, Trina)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 19, 2009

Filing 11 ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR., on 5/19/2009; adopting the Magistrate Judge's rulings (doc. no. 8 ), that Respondent's motion to dismiss (docket no. 4 ) is granted, that the petition (docket no. 1 ) is dismissed, that this action is dismissed, and that finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is denied. (Lloyd, Donna)

April 2, 2009

Filing 8 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION - MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE DONALD P. DIETRICH on 04/02/09, that Respondent's motion to dismiss (Docket No. 4 ) be granted, that the petition (Docket No. 1 ) be dismissed, and that Judgment be entered dismissing this action. (Law, Trina)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MUSTAFA v. BECK
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: WILLIAM ABDULLAH MUSTAFA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: THEODIS BECK
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?