WILKERSON v. CHAPEL HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit North Carolina Middle District WILKERSON v. CHAPEL HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT

WILKERSON v. CHAPEL HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT

Plaintiff:	BRIAN WILKERSON
Defendant:	CHAPEL HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT
Case Number:	1:2009cv00060
Filed:	January 23, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office:	Civil Rights: Other Office
County:	Orange
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge:	WALLACE W. DIXON
Presiding Judge:	UNASSIGNED
Nature of Suit:	Defendant
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:1331 Fed. Question

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 28, 2010	Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION signed by MAG/JUDGE WALLACE W. DIXON on 9/28/2010. RECOMMENDED that the court GRANT Defendant's motion to dismiss (docket no. 17 ) and dismiss this action with prejudice. (Butler, Carol)
May 27, 2009	Filing 12 ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION - MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE WALLACE W. DIXON on 05/27/09, ordering that the court will allow Plaintiff to cure the deficiencies in his complaint by naming a proper "person" as a defendant. No later than Tuesday, June 9, 2009, Plaintiff must file his amended complaint identifying a proper defendant subject to suit under section 1983. Plaintiff is cautioned that if he fails to comply with this Order, his complaint is subject to being dismissed for failure to state a claim; recommending that the Chapel Hill Police Department be dismissed as a Defendant. (Law, Trina)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 28, 2010

Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION signed by MAG/JUDGE WALLACE W. DIXON on 9/28/2010. RECOMMENDED that the court GRANT Defendant's motion to dismiss (docket no. 17 ) and dismiss this action with prejudice. (Butler, Carol)

May 27, 2009

Filing 12 ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION - MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE WALLACE W. DIXON on 05/27/09, ordering that the court will allow Plaintiff to cure the deficiencies in his complaint by naming a proper "person" as a defendant. No later than Tuesday, June 9, 2009, Plaintiff must file his amended complaint identifying a proper defendant subject to suit under section 1983. Plaintiff is cautioned that if he fails to comply with this Order, his complaint is subject to being dismissed for failure to state a claim; recommending that the Chapel Hill Police Department be dismissed as a Defendant. (Law, Trina)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WILKERSON v. CHAPEL HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: BRIAN WILKERSON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: CHAPEL HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT
Represented By:	KARI R. JOHNSON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?