SMITH v. WHITE
Petitioner: WILLIAM THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Respondent: DARLENE WHITE
Case Number: 1:2009cv00061
Filed: January 23, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Forsyth
Presiding Judge: WALLACE W. DIXON
Presiding Judge: UNASSIGNED
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION and RECOMMENDATION of UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE DONALD P. DIETRICH on 5/13/2009 that Respondent's motion for summary judgment (docket no. 4 ) be granted, that the petition (docket no. 1 ) be denied, and that Judgment be entered dismissing this action. (Lee, Lisa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SMITH v. WHITE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: WILLIAM THOMAS SMITH, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DARLENE WHITE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?