WIMBUSH v. POTTER et al
| WILLIAM WIMBUSH |
| JOHN E. POTTER, EDITH STRICKLAND, CRYSTAL BROWN and JAMES TARTER |
| 1:2009cv00358 |
| May 18, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Guilford |
| WALLACE W. DIXON |
| UNASSIGNED |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Unlawful Employment Practices |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by CHIEF JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR on 03/13/2012. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court finds that summary judgment is appropriate on all claims raised by the Plaintiff in this case. Plaintiff was not disabled within th e meaning of the Rehabilitation Act and is therefore unable to establish a prima facie case of disability discrimination. Plaintiff also failed to establish a prima facie case for constructive discharge, race discrimination, hostile work environment, and retaliation. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 24 ] will be GRANTED, and all of Plaintiff's claims will be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. In addition, Defendant's Motion to Strike Inadmissible, Unauthenticated Attachments to Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 29 ] will be DENIED as moot. An Order and Judgment consistent with this Memorandum Opinion will be filed contemporaneously herewith.(Taylor, Abby)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
