JAMES v. RJ REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY

JAMES v. RJ REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY

Plaintiff:	JEFFREY JAMES
Defendant:	RJ REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
Case Number:	1:2009cv00552
Filed:	July 24, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office:	NCMD Office
County:	Guilford
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge:	WALLACE W. DIXON
Presiding Judge:	UNASSIGNED
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 24, 2013	Filing 50 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 1/24/2013, that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry 34 ) is GRANTED. (Lloyd, Donna)
April 26, 2010	Filing 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 4/26/10, that the parties' Motion for Entry of Consent Protective Order (Docket Entry 13 ) is DENIED. FURTHER that the parties may submit an "Amended Consent Protective Or der" consistent with the terms of this Memorandum Opinion and Order or, alternatively, may file a motion for reconsideration asking the Court to enter the "Consent Protective Order" as drafted, with a supporting brief that demonstrates the propriety of the original proposal. (Law, Trina)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 24, 2013

Filing 50 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 1/24/2013, that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry 34 ) is GRANTED. (Lloyd, Donna)

April 26, 2010

Filing 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 4/26/10, that the parties' Motion for Entry of Consent Protective Order (Docket Entry 13 ) is DENIED. FURTHER that the parties may submit an "Amended Consent Protective Or der" consistent with the terms of this Memorandum Opinion and Order or, alternatively, may file a motion for reconsideration asking the Court to enter the "Consent Protective Order" as drafted, with a supporting brief that demonstrates the propriety of the original proposal. (Law, Trina)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JAMES v. RJ REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: JEFFREY JAMES
Represented By:	JONATHAN WALL
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: RJ REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?