BROWN v. EWART et al
| GLORBMAN LAMONT BROWN |
| J. EWART, MORGAN, FAGGART, A. LANE and LANE |
| 1:2009cv00573 |
| July 29, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Rowan |
| P. TREVOR SHARP |
| UNASSIGNED |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 1/28/2013; that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 76 ), is GRANTED. (Sheets, Jamie)
|
|
Filing
75
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 10/30/2012; that: 1. The Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. 40 ), is DENIED as to Mr. Brown's claim against Mr. Faggart concerning the conditions of Mr. Brown's confinement in the detox cell. 2. The Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 65 ), is GRANTED as to the claim against all Defendants concerning their failure to prevent John Leach's assault of Mr. Brown. 3. The Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. 40 ), is othe rwise GRANTED as to all other claims and Defendants. 4. The only claim remaining in the lawsuit is Mr. Brown's claim against Mr. Faggart concerning the conditions of Mr. Brown's confinement in the detox cell. Any summary judgment motion related to this claim shall be filed no later than November 19, 2012. (Sheets, Jamie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
