WHITED v. ASTRUE

WHITED v. ASTRUE

Plaintiff:	CLIFFORD T WHITED
Defendant:	MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Case Number:	1:2009cv00868
Filed:	November 11, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office:	NCMD Office
County:	Randolph
Presiding Judge:	WILLIAM L. OSTEEN JR.
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 23, 2011	Filing 14 ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 02/22/2011. The court has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. re 11 Report and Recommendations. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment seeking a reversal of the Commissioner's decision [Docket No. 7 ] is DENIED, that the Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings [Docket No. 9 ] is GRANTED, that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability is AFFIRMED, and that this action is dismissed with prejudice. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously withthis Order. (Taylor, Abby)
August 4, 2010	Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION - MAGISTRATE JUDGE - signed by MAG/JUDGE WALLACE W. DIXON on 08/04/2010, for the foregoing reasons, the decision of the Commissioner is supported by substantial evidence and the correct legal principles were appl ied. Therefore, IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability be AFFIRMED. To this extent, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (docket no. 7 ) seeking a reversal of the Commissioner's decision should be DENIED, Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (docket no. 9 ) should be GRANTED, and this action should be DISMISSED with prejudice.(Taylor, Abby)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 23, 2011

Filing 14 ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 02/22/2011. The court has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. re 11 Report and Recommendations. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment seeking a reversal of the Commissioner's decision [Docket No. 7 ] is DENIED, that the Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings [Docket No. 9 ] is GRANTED, that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability is AFFIRMED, and that this action is dismissed with prejudice. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously withthis Order. (Taylor, Abby)

August 4, 2010

Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION - MAGISTRATE JUDGE - signed by MAG/JUDGE WALLACE W. DIXON on 08/04/2010, for the foregoing reasons, the decision of the Commissioner is supported by substantial evidence and the correct legal principles were appl ied. Therefore, IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability be AFFIRMED. To this extent, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (docket no. 7 ) seeking a reversal of the Commissioner's decision should be DENIED, Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (docket no. 9 ) should be GRANTED, and this action should be DISMISSED with prejudice.(Taylor, Abby)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WHITED v. ASTRUE
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: CLIFFORD T WHITED
Represented By:	JASON LEE WILSON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?