JOHNSON v. CITY OF DURHAM et al
| MICHAEL JOHNSON |
| CITY OF DURHAM, WILLIAM V. BELL, THOMAS J. BONFIELD, THEODORE L. VOORHEES, KEITH C. HADWELL, CORA MCFADDEN, DIANE CATOTTE, HOWARD CLEMENT, III, EUGENE A. BROWN, FARED ALI, J. MICHAEL WOODARD, CONSTANCE STACI, RICK HESTER, STACEY CRABTREE and BURT RAUCH |
| 1:2009cv00954 |
| December 15, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Durham |
| P. TREVOR SHARP |
| UNASSIGNED |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER, AND RECOMMENDATION - MAGISTRATE JUDGE. IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that 28 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) be GRANTED, that 25 Plaintiffs Motion for Judgement o n the Pleadings be DENIED, and that this action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS ORDERED that all of Plaintiffs other pending motions 23 , 24 , 27 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 40 , 41 , 47 are DENIED. Signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 9/30/2011. (Powell, Gloria)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR on 3/22/11, adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, that Defendants' original Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 5 ] is DENIED without prejudice, but this Order shall not alter or otherwise affect any other Motion currently pending before the Magistrate Judge in this case. (Welch, Kelly)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER, AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE defendant's motion to amend 10 is granted and that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (Docket Entry 5 ) be DENIED, but without prejudice to re-filing after Plaintiff has an opportunity to amend his Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Motion to Dismiss (Docket Entry 9 ) and Plaintiffs Motion for Supplemental Complaint (Docket Entry 11 ) are DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to the extent it requests action by the Court, Plaintiff's Demand Letter for Settlement (Docket Entry 14 ) is DENIED. Signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 10/1/2010. (Lapira, Sharon)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
