LAMONDS v. PIERCE
Plaintiff: TERESA BREWER LAMONDS
Defendant: T. J. PIERCE
Case Number: 1:2009cv00962
Filed: December 17, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: WALLACE W. DIXON
Presiding Judge: UNASSIGNED
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 53 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 02/15/2013; that Sergeant Pierce's Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 29 ), is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's Motion to Strike the Affidavit of Isaac T.Avery, III, (Doc. 48 ), is DISMISSED AS MOOT. (Garland, Leah)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LAMONDS v. PIERCE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TERESA BREWER LAMONDS
Represented By: B. ERVIN BROWN, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. J. PIERCE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?