FENNER v. JOHN UMSTEAD HOSPITAL et al
JOHN UMSTEAD HOSPITAL and SUSAN REGIER |
WALDO FENNER |
1:2009cv00977 |
December 21, 2009 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
NCMD Office |
Durham |
P. TREVOR SHARP |
UNASSIGNED |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Unlawful Employment Practices |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 1/23/2014; that JUH's motion to dismiss for insufficient service of process (Doc. 35 ) is GRANTED and the complaint against JUH, and this action, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Sheets, Jamie) |
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 02/19/2013 as set out herein. RECOMMENDED that Defendants John Umstead Hospital and Susan Regier's Motion to Dismiss Pursua nt to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(2) (Docket Entry 7 ) be granted in part and denied in part in that the Court should dismiss Plaintiff's Title VII claim(s) against Susan Regier, but that the Court should afford Plaint iff an opportunity to perfect service of process on John Umstead Hospital and should consider as moot Defendants' arguments regarding Plaintiff's Right-to-Sue Letter in light of Plaintiffs' subsequent filing of said Letter (Docket Entry 12 -2), which the Clerk should docket as an attachment to the Complaint (Docket Entry 2 ).(Taylor, Abby) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.