AVILA v. USA
Plaintiff: FRANCISCO DURAN AVILA
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2009cv01001
Filed: December 28, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
County: Alamance
Presiding Judge: UNASSIGNED
Presiding Judge: P. TREVOR SHARP
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 3114 Motion for Return of Seized Property
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER signed by JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR on 6/10/2015 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. # 10 ]; that Plaintiff's Motion for the Return of Property [Doc. # 9 ] is DENIED. (Sheets, Jamie)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: AVILA v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: FRANCISCO DURAN AVILA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: ANGELA HEWLETT MILLER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?