MORRIS v. THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES, et al
| JOHN LEE MORRIS, SR. |
| THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES, JUDGES, ATTORNEYS, CLERKS, ROBERT J. FAVROT, WILLIAM J. DZIWURA, ROY COOPER, ROBERT MONTGOMERY, SARAH PARKER, MARK D. MARTION, ROBERT H. EDMUNDS, JR., EDWARD T BRANDY, PATRICIA TIMMONS GOODSON, PAUL M. NEWBY, ROBIN E. HUDSON, JUSTICE NIEMEYER, JUSTICE TRAYLER, JUSTICE GREGORY, WILLIAM K. SUTER, JEFFREY ATKINS, RUTH JONES and PAMELA K. STUMP |
| 1:2010cv00130 |
| February 16, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Durham |
| UNASSIGNED |
| P. TREVOR SHARP |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR on 01/14/2011. The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the courtin accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on November 15, 2010, was served on the parties in this act ion. Plaintiff filed a motion to strike [Docket No. 95 ] which will be construed as objections to the Recommendation. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's dispositive motions [Docket Nos. 70 and 77 are DENIED, that the motions to dismiss filed by Defendants [Docket Nos. 4 and 44 ] are GRANTED, and that this action is dismissed with prejudice. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. (Taylor, Abby)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE P. TREVOR SHARP on 11/15/2010, ORDERING that the non-dispositivemotions (Docket Nos. 14 , 15 , 24 , 25 , 31 , 32 , 34 , 54 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 78 , an d 86 ) are all without merit and are DENIED. The dispositive motions are likewise without merit in view of the failure of the Complaint at the threshold, and IT IS RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's dispositive motions (Docket Nos. 70 and 77 ) be denied. Further, IT IS RECOMMENDED that the motions to dismiss filed by Defendants (Docket Nos. 4 and 44 ) be granted and that this action be dismissed with prejudice. (Butler, Carol)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
