NUNN v. COOPER

NUNN v. COOPER

Petitioner:	MYRON RODERICK NUNN
Respondent:	ROY COOPER
Case Number:	1:2010cv00164
Filed:	March 1, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office:	NCMD Office
County:	Durham
Presiding Judge:	L. PATRICK AULD
Presiding Judge:	UNASSIGNED
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 13, 2011	Filing 41 MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER, AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE that Petitioner's motions for discovery and appointment of counsel (Docket Entry 9 ), for production of documents (Docket Entry 18 ), for an order compelling disco very (Docket Entry 20 ), for further discovery (Docket Entry 29 ), for withdrawal of a separate civil complaint regarding conditions of confinement (Docket Entry 30 ), for amendment of a separate civil complaint regarding conditions of confinement (Docket Entry 35 ), and for withdrawal of consent to the exercise of jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge (Docket Entry 36 ) are DENIED. IT IS RECOMMENDED that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Docket Entry 5 ) be GRANTED, that Petitioners motio ns for default judgment (Docket Entries 16 and 21 ), for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus (Docket Entry 27 ), and for equitable relief, including in the form of various requested transfers (Docket Entries 25 , 28 , 32 and 37 ) be DENIED, that the Habeas Petition (Docket Entry 2 ) be DISMISSED, and that Judgment be entered DISMISSING this action. Signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 4/13/2011. (Lapira, Sharon)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 13, 2011

Filing 41 MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER, AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE that Petitioner's motions for discovery and appointment of counsel (Docket Entry 9 ), for production of documents (Docket Entry 18 ), for an order compelling disco very (Docket Entry 20 ), for further discovery (Docket Entry 29 ), for withdrawal of a separate civil complaint regarding conditions of confinement (Docket Entry 30 ), for amendment of a separate civil complaint regarding conditions of confinement (Docket Entry 35 ), and for withdrawal of consent to the exercise of jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge (Docket Entry 36 ) are DENIED. IT IS RECOMMENDED that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Docket Entry 5 ) be GRANTED, that Petitioners motio ns for default judgment (Docket Entries 16 and 21 ), for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus (Docket Entry 27 ), and for equitable relief, including in the form of various requested transfers (Docket Entries 25 , 28 , 32 and 37 ) be DENIED, that the Habeas Petition (Docket Entry 2 ) be DISMISSED, and that Judgment be entered DISMISSING this action. Signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 4/13/2011. (Lapira, Sharon)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NUNN v. COOPER
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: MYRON RODERICK NUNN
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: ROY COOPER
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?