PLAYER v. KELLER
Petitioner: DENNIS ALEXANDER PLAYER
Respondent: ALVIN KELLER
Case Number: 1:2010cv00282
Filed: April 12, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
County: Randolph
Presiding Judge: UNASSIGNED
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 3/30/2011, that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Docket Entry 5 ) is granted, that the Habeas Petition (Docket Entry 1 ) is dismissed, and that this action is dismissed. (Daniel, J)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PLAYER v. KELLER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: DENNIS ALEXANDER PLAYER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ALVIN KELLER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?