BARTLETT v. KELLER

BARTLETT v. KELLER

Petitioner:	ROBERT ANDREW BARTLETT, SR.
Respondent:	ALVIN W. KELLER
Case Number:	1:2010cv00437
Filed:	June 4, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office:	NCMD Office
County:	Alamance
Presiding Judge:	UNASSIGNED
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 18, 2011	Filing 26 ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 07/18/2011. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is adopted to the extent indicated by this Order, the Respondent's motion for summary judgment (docket no. 6 )is GRANT ED, that Petitioner's motions for summary judgment (docket no. 15 ) and to expand the record (docket no. 17 ) are DENIED, and that this action is DISMISSED. Finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is not issued. (Taylor, Abby)
March 31, 2011	Filing 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION - MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE WALLACE W. DIXON on 03/31/2011. For the foregoing reasons, IT IS RECOMMENDED that Respondent's motion for summary judgment (docket no. 6 ) be GRANTED, that Petitioner's motions for summary judgment (docket no. 15 ) and to expand the record (docket no. 17 ) be DENIED, and that the petition be DISMISSED.(Taylor, Abby)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 18, 2011

Filing 26 ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 07/18/2011. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is adopted to the extent indicated by this Order, the Respondent's motion for summary judgment (docket no. 6 )is GRANT ED, that Petitioner's motions for summary judgment (docket no. 15 ) and to expand the record (docket no. 17 ) are DENIED, and that this action is DISMISSED. Finding no substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction, nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is not issued. (Taylor, Abby)

March 31, 2011

Filing 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION - MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE WALLACE W. DIXON on 03/31/2011. For the foregoing reasons, IT IS RECOMMENDED that Respondent's motion for summary judgment (docket no. 6 ) be GRANTED, that Petitioner's motions for summary judgment (docket no. 15 ) and to expand the record (docket no. 17 ) be DENIED, and that the petition be DISMISSED.(Taylor, Abby)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BARTLETT v. KELLER
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: ROBERT ANDREW BARTLETT, SR.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: ALVIN W. KELLER
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?