BOWERS v. ASTRUE
| THOMAS R. BOWERS |
| MICHAEL J. ASTRUE |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 1:2010cv00458 |
| June 14, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Davie |
| Disability Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR on 06/16/2014, that the Court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, and that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability is AFFIRMED, that Plaintiff's Mot ion for Judgment Reversing Judgment of the Commissioner or Remanding the Cause for Rehearing [Doc. # 10 is DENIED, that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Doc. # 13 is GRANTED, and that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. A Judgment will be entered contemporaneously with this Order. (Taylor, Abby)
|
|
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 05/12/2014 as set out herein. RECOMMENDED that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability be affirmed, that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment Reversing Judgment of the Commissioner or Remanding the Cause for Rehearing (Docket Entry 10 ) be denied, that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket Entry 13 ) be granted, and that this action be dismissed with prejudice.(Taylor, Abby)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
