NORMAN
Plaintiff: BRIAN DONALD NORMAN
Case Number: 1:2010cv00653
Filed: August 23, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
County: Forsyth
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE P. TREVOR SHARP on 1/18/2012; RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute; ORDERING that Plaintiff's motion for a hearing (Docket No. 15 ) is DENIED as without merit. (Lloyd, Donna)
June 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 13 RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE P. TREVOR SHARP on 6/10/11. For Plaintiff's failure to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute (see Order of May 19, 2011), IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Wilson, JoAnne)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NORMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BRIAN DONALD NORMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?