DAVIS v. BELLSOUTH SHORT TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR NON-SALARIED EMPLOYEES et al
| AARON D. DAVIS |
| BELLSOUTH SHORT TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR NON-SALARIED EMPLOYEES, BELLSOUTH LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR NON-SALARIED EMPLOYEES, AT&T INTEGRATED DISABILITY SERVICE CENTER, EMPLOYEES' BENEFIT COMMITTEE OF BELLSOUTH, AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NUMBER 1, AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NUMBER 2, BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. and AT&T CORPORATION |
| NAHOMI HARKAVY |
| 1:2010cv00977 |
| December 22, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Surry |
| UNASSIGNED |
| WALLACE W. DIXON |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE on 03/13/2021. For the foregoing reasons, IT IS RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 29 ] be GRANTED as to his eligibility for the full extent of STD benefits and any other associated employment benefits, but DENIED as to his eligibility for LTD benefits. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 31 ] be DENIED except that Plaintiff's application for LTD benefits be remanded to the Plan Administrator for an eligibility determination. (Taylor, Abby)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
