E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY v. MACDERMID PRINTING SOLUTIONS, L.L.C.
| E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY |
| MACDERMID PRINTING SOLUTIONS, L.L.C. |
| PHILLIP BEIGHLE |
| 1:2010mc00039 |
| June 8, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| UNASSIGNED |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 3/6/12, that the Motion to Quash Subpoena to Testify Served Upon Phillip Beighle (Docket Entry 1 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; in that D uPont can proceed with its deposition of Dr. Beighle limited to matters concerning MacDermid's internal manufacturing difficulties for purposes of refuting MacDermid's allegations that anti-competitive conduct on the part of DuPont caused M acDermid's failure to achieve success in the marketplace. FURTHER that each party shall file an appropriate motion to seal addressing the relevant considerations for filing their respective briefs and attachments thereto under seal with the Cou rt by March 30, 2012. If DuPont has not filed any such motion to seal by that date, the Clerk shall unseal DuPont's Docket Entries 3 and 3-2 through 3-7. If Dr. Beighle has not filed any such motion to seal by that date, the Clerk shall unseal Dr. Beighle's Docket Entries 4 , 4-2 and 4-3. (Law, Trina)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
