PATTERSON v. RANDAZZO et al
| CHRISTOPHER O'NEAL PATTERSON |
| JASON RANDAZZO, GERALD JONES, KRISTEN BENNET, JUSTIN FLYNT, MATTHEW PHILLIP O'HAL, JOEL CRANFORD and ERNEST K. WRENN |
| 1:2011cv00138 |
| February 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Guilford |
| UNASSIGNED |
| P. TREVOR SHARP |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
123
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 02/04/2016; that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is ADOPTED but as modified by this Memorandum Opinion, that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 95 ) is GRANTED, Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 82 ) is DENIED as moot, and Patterson's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A judgment in accordance with this Memorandum Opinion and Order will be entered simultaneously. (Garland, Leah)
|
|
Filing
118
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION as to CHRISTOPHER O'NEAL PATTERSON signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 9/3/2015, that this court finds that there is no genuine 1ssue of material fact and therefore Defendants are enti tled to summary judgment. Accordingly, the Court RECOMMENDS that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry 95 ) be GRANTED. The Court further RECOMMENDS that Defendants' motion to dismiss (Docket Entry 82 ) be denied as moot.(Butler, Carol)
|
|
Filing
54
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 09/30/2013, that Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 39 ) is GRANTED as to Patterson's Eighth Amendment claim, his Fourteenth Amendment substantive due p rocess claim, and all claims against Defendants in their official capacities. These claims shall be DISMISSED. FURTHER that Defendants' motion to dismiss Patterson's Fourth Amendment excessive force claim against Defendant s in their individual capacities (Doc. 39 ) is GRANTED as to all claims predicted on conduct that precedes the time Patterson surrendered, remained subdued and unarmed, and no longer posed a threat; in all other respects, the motion is DENIED without prejudice to it being raised upon a further showing. FURTHER that Patterson's motion to appoint counsel (Doc. 43 ) is DENIED without prejudice.(Taylor, Abby)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
