PHILLIPS v. DONAHOE
Plaintiff: RICKY ALLEN PHILLIPS
Defendant: PATRICK R. DONAHOE
Case Number: 1:2011cv00279
Filed: April 8, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
County: Yadkin
Presiding Judge: UNASSIGNED
Presiding Judge: WALLACE W. DIXON
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12112
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 51 MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION of MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE signed on 2/21/2013, recommending that Defendant's Motion for SummaryJudgment (Doc. # 26 ) be GRANTED, and that this action be DISMISSED. FURTHER, that Defendant's Motion to Strike (Doc. # 38 ) is DENIED without prejudice. (Daniel, J)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PHILLIPS v. DONAHOE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RICKY ALLEN PHILLIPS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PATRICK R. DONAHOE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?