ROYBAL v. ASTRUE
| ROBERT H. ROYBAL |
| MICHAEL J. ASTRUE |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 1:2011cv00389 |
| May 16, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Moore |
| THOMAS D. SCHROEDER |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 6/9/2014 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (doc. 16 ), that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability is REVERSED and the action is REMANDED to the Commissioner under 42 U.S .C. § 405(g). The Commissioner is directed to remand the matter to the ALJ for further consideration of Roybal's claim in light of the court's ruling. Therefore, Roybal's motion for judgment (Doc. 10 ) is GRANTED to the extent set out herein, and the Commissioner's motion (Doc. 12 ) is DENIED. (Lloyd, Donna)
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 5/20/2014. RECOMMENDED that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability be affirmed, that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment Reversing Judgment of the Commissioner or Remanding theCause for Rehearing (Docket Entry 10 ) be denied, that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket Entry 12 ) be granted, and that this action be dismissed with prejudice. (Butler, Carol)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
