HARRINGTON v. WESTDALE ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

Defendant: WESTDALE ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and WESTDALE ASSET MANAGEMENT, LTD.
Plaintiff: BENJAMIN HARRINGTON
Case Number: 1:2011cv00458
Filed: June 8, 2011
Court: North Carolina Middle District Court
Office: NCMD Office
County: Orange
Presiding Judge: UNASSIGNED
Referring Judge: L. PATRICK AULD
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HARRINGTON v. WESTDALE ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WESTDALE ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Represented By: ANDREW A. BENNINGTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WESTDALE ASSET MANAGEMENT, LTD.
Represented By: ANDREW A. BENNINGTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BENJAMIN HARRINGTON
Represented By: JOHN W. GRESHAM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.