CENTRAL STATEES SOUTHEAST & SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND ET AL v. CARGO CARRIERS, INC. ET AL
CENTRAL STATES SOUTHEAST & SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND and HOWARD MCDOUGALL |
CARGO CARRIERS, INC., DONALD C. FISHER, MARY R. FISHER, MICHAEL S. ALBERT, IRVIN W. ALBERT, EDGAR B. HINKLE, JR., JULIUS S. YOUNG and CHARLES J. YOUNG |
1:2011cv00461 |
June 9, 2011 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
NCMD Office |
XX US, Outside State |
UNASSIGNED |
P. TREVOR SHARP |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 73 MEMORANDUM OPINION, RECOMMENDATION, AND ORDER OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 7/22/2013; that Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Docket Entry 65 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs shal l file an Amended Complaint in substantially the same form as Exhibit A to their instant Motion for Leave by July 29, 2013. FURTHER that Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike (Docket Entry 66 ) is DENIED as moot. RECOMMENDED that Defendant Cargo Carriers' Motion to Dismiss (Docket Entry 59 ) be denied as moot. FURTHER RECOMMENDED that Individual Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket Entry 61 ) be denied (in part as moot). (Sheets, Jamie) |
Filing 40 MEMORANDUM Opinion Signed by the Honorable Samuel Der-Yeghiayan on 6/9/2011: Mailed notice(hp, ) [Transferred from Illinois Northern on 6/9/2011.] |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.