TAYLOR v. OAK FOREST HEALTH AND REHABILITATION, et al
| TELETIA R. TAYLOR |
| UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC., SANSTONE HEALTH AND REHABILITATION, BEYSTONE HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CO., OAK FOREST HEALTH AND REHABILITATION, LLC and ARDENT HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CO. |
| 1:2011cv00471 |
| June 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Forsyth |
| UNASSIGNED |
| L. PATRICK AULD |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
124
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 9/9/2014; that the "Motion to Object Deposition Transcript and Request Documents," (Doc. 81 ), is DENIED. The Motion for Summary Judgment by defendants Ardent Healt h and Rehabilitation, Beystone Health and Rehabilitation, Oak Forest Health and Rehabilitation, and Sanstone Health and Rehabilitation, (Doc. 83 ), is GRANTED. The Motion to Dismiss by defendants Ardent Health and Rehabilitation, Beystone Hea lth and Rehabilitation, Oak Forest Health and Rehabilitation, and Sanstone Health and Rehabilitation pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 and 41, (Doc. 87 ), is GRANTED. The Motion for Summary Judgment by United Healthcare Services, Inc., (Doc. [90 ]), is GRANTED. The Plaintiff's Dispositive Motion for Liabilities Settlement, (Doc. 96 ), is DENIED. The Motion to Dismiss by United Healthcare Services, (Doc. 98 ), is GRANTED. All other pending motions are DENIED as moot. Because of the pattern of abusive motions filed by Ms. Taylor, the defendants need not file responses to any future motions filed by Ms. Taylor unless requested by the Court. The Clerk shall refer any such motions to the Court immediately upon filing. Ms. Taylor is WARNED that further sanctions may imposed, including riminal contempt and limits upon her right to file future pleadings, should she violate Rule 11 of the Rules of Civil Procedure going forward. Judgment will be entered consistent with this Order, as time permits. (Sheets, Jamie)
|
|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 8/22/2013, that: 1. The motions to dismiss, (Docs. 34 , 38 ), are GRANTED as to Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10 and 12; 2. The motions to dismiss, (Docs. 34 , 38 ), are GRANTED as to the part of Claim 11 which seeks statutory penalties against United Healthcare and is otherwise DENIED as to Claim 11; 3. The motions to dismiss, (Docs. 34 , 38 ), are DENIED as to claims 9 and 13; and 4. The motions to strike, (Docs. 36 , 40 ), are GRANTED. (Lloyd, Donna)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
