BROWER-MITCHEM v. BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY a/k/a/BB&T
| LISA T. BROWER-MITCHEM |
| BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY |
| 1:2011cv00535 |
| July 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Guilford |
| CATHERINE C. EAGLES |
| P. TREVOR SHARP |
| Employment |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 704 |
| Plaintiff |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BROWER-MITCHEM v. BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY a/k/a/BB&T | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: LISA T. BROWER-MITCHEM | |
| Represented By: | NORMAN B. SMITH |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | DANIELLE M. BARBOUR |
| Represented By: | KEVIN MICHAEL CEGLOWSKI |
| Represented By: | SUSANNA KNUTSON GIBBONS |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
