THOMPSON et al v. MISSION ESSENTIAL PERSONNEL, LLC
ESTATE OF CAPTAIN DAVID JOHNPAUL THOMPSON, CHIEF WARRANT OFFICER THOMAS RUSSELL, TINA RUSSELL and ESTATE OF SPECIALIST MARC P. DECOTEAU |
MISSION ESSENTIAL PERSONNEL, LLC |
1:2011cv00547 |
July 11, 2011 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
NCMD Office |
Moore |
UNASSIGNED |
P. TREVOR SHARP |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR on 09/23/2014, as set out herein. ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 10 is hereby GRANTED as set forth herein. FURTHER that this matte r be TRANSFERRED to the Eastern District of Virginia. The Court notes that Plaintiffs filed a motion [Doc. # 35 requesting a hearing on their objections and another motion [Doc. # 37 requesting a status conference. Given that the Court has now considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation and made a de novo determination, Plaintiffs' Motions are deemed moot and are therefore DENIED.(Taylor, Abby) |
Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 11/14/2013 as et out herein. RECOMMENDED that Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction (Docket Entry 10 ) be GRANTED and this action be TRANSFERRED to the Eastern District of Virginia.(Taylor, Abby) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.