BENEZRA v. ZACKS INVESTMENT RESEARCH, INC. et al
| STEVEN BENEZRA and MELISSA YORK |
| MITCHEL ETHAN ZACKS, ZACKS INVESTMENT RESEARCH, INC., ZACKS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC., LEONARD HARVEY ZACKS and BENJAMIN LAIB ZACKS |
| 1:2011cv00596 |
| July 26, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Orange |
| L. PATRICK AULD |
| THOMAS D. SCHROEDER |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 22 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 3/30/2012, Defendants' Motion to Strike (Doc. 16 ) is DENIED; 2. Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss or Stay Proceedings as Restated (Docs. 11 , 18 ) is GRANTED insofar as it seeks to compel arbitration of Plaintiff Steven Benezra's claims not otherwise disposed of in this Order and insofar as it seeks to dismiss the claims of Plaintiff Melissa York, and her claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJ UDICE; 3. Because the positions of the parties were set out adequately in the briefing, Plaintiffs' Request for Hearing (Doc. 23 ) is DENIED; 4. This case is STAYED pending further order of the court. The Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively close the file. The parties shall file a joint report of arbitration every ninety (90) days. Failure to file such reports may result in dismissal of the action. (Lloyd, Donna)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
