CLAYTON et al v. BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST et al
Petitioner: BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST, DAVID A. SIMPSON, P.C. and JOHN DOES 1-10
Respondent: GAIL CLAYTON and THOMAS CLAYTON
Case Number: 1:2011cv00783
Filed: September 23, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
County: Alamance
Presiding Judge: UNASSIGNED
Presiding Judge: P. TREVOR SHARP
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER signed by JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR on 1/17/2013 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. # 37 ]; that the Motion to Remand [Doc. # 10 ] filed by BB&T and David A. Simpson, P.C., is GRANTED and this action is REMANDED< /b> to the Alamance County, North Carolina, Superior Court. FURTHER that the Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 13 ] filed by BB&T and David A. Simpson, P.C., is DENIED as MOOT. ORDERED that the Motion for Default Judgment [Doc. # 12 ] and Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 21 ] filed by Gail Clayton and Thomas Clayton are DENIED without prejudice in light of the remand. (Sheets, Jamie)
September 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER, AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE on 9/12/2012; RECOMMENDING that the Motion to Remand [Doc.# 10 ] filed by BB&T and David A. Simpson, P.C. be granted, and t hat this action be remanded to the Alamance County, North Carolina, Superior Court. FURTHER RECOMMENDING that the Motion to Dismiss filed by BB&T and David A. Simpson, P.C. [Doc. # 13 ] be denied as moot. FURTHER RECOMMENDING that the Claytons' Motion for Default Judgment [Doc. # 12 ] and Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 21 ] be denied without prejudice in light of the remand. (Sheets, Jamie)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CLAYTON et al v. BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST
Represented By: LACEY M. MOORE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: DAVID A. SIMPSON, P.C.
Represented By: LACEY M. MOORE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JOHN DOES 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: GAIL CLAYTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THOMAS CLAYTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?