TYNDALL v. MAYNOR

TYNDALL v. MAYNOR

Plaintiff:	AMOS TYNDALL
Defendant:	TIMOTHY DEAN MAYNOR
Case Number:	1:2011cv00836
Filed:	October 6, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office:	NCMD Office
County:	Orange
Presiding Judge:	L. PATRICK AULD
Presiding Judge:	JAMES A. BEATY
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 7, 2013	Filing 37 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 01/07/2013; that Defendant's Motion to Amend Answer (Docket Entry 29 ) is DENIED. FURTHER that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Discovery Schedule (Docket Entr y 32 ) is DENIED, except as to mediation, which the parties shall conduct by February 15, 2013. FURTHER that, on or before January 18, 2013, the parties shall file a joint report setting out their shared or respective views on whether and, if so, why certain exhibits (Docket Entry 3 ), the Complaint (Docket Entry 5 ), and the Summons (Docket Entry 6 ) should remain under seal. (Garland, Leah)
April 10, 2012	Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR., on 4/10/2012, that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue, or in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer [Doc. # 16 ] is hereby DENIED. (Lloyd, Donna)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 7, 2013

Filing 37 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 01/07/2013; that Defendant's Motion to Amend Answer (Docket Entry 29 ) is DENIED. FURTHER that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Discovery Schedule (Docket Entr y 32 ) is DENIED, except as to mediation, which the parties shall conduct by February 15, 2013. FURTHER that, on or before January 18, 2013, the parties shall file a joint report setting out their shared or respective views on whether and, if so, why certain exhibits (Docket Entry 3 ), the Complaint (Docket Entry 5 ), and the Summons (Docket Entry 6 ) should remain under seal. (Garland, Leah)

April 10, 2012

Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by CHIEF JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR., on 4/10/2012, that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue, or in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer [Doc. # 16 ] is hereby DENIED. (Lloyd, Donna)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TYNDALL v. MAYNOR
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: TIMOTHY DEAN MAYNOR
Represented By:	PETER ANDREW REGULSKI
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: AMOS TYNDALL
Represented By:	LYNNE M. HOLTKAMP
Represented By:	STEPHEN LUKE LARGESS
Represented By:	BARRY T. WINSTON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?