PALTALK HOLDINGS, INC. v. SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA INC. Featured Case
Plaintiff: PALTALK HOLDINGS, INC.
Defendant: SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA INC., NCSOFT CORPORATION, SONY ONLINE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, SONY CORPORATION, SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, ACTIVISION PUBLISHING, INC., ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC. and BLIZZARD ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
Movant: DR. KETAN MAYER-PATEL
Case Number: 1:2011mc00040
Filed: June 15, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
Presiding Judge: UNASSIGNED
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 6, 2011 Filing 4 RESPONSE in Opposition re 1 MOTION to Quash filed by ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC., ACTIVISION PUBLISHING, INC., BLIZZARD ENTERTAINMENT, INC., SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA INC., SONY CORPORATION, SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, SONY ONLINE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC. Replies due by 7/25/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Patel Declaration, # 2 Exhibit B - Interview Summary, # 3 Exhibit C - Notice of Subpoena to Appear, # 4 Exhibit D - Notice of Subpoena to Produce)(OWENS, BRUCE)
July 6, 2011 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney BRUCE EDWARD OWENS, JR., on behalf of Defendants ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.; ACTIVISION PUBLISHING, INC.; BLIZZARD ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA INC.; SONY CORPORATION, SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, SONY ONLINE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC. (OWENS, BRUCE)
June 23, 2011 Case Assigned to UNASSIGNED JUDGE. (Powell, Gloria)
June 15, 2011 Filing 2 BRIEF In Support of 1 MOTION to Quash, or in the Alternative to Modify, Subpoenas. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F) (Sheets, Jamie)
June 15, 2011 Filing 1 MOTION to Quash, or in the Alternative to Modify, Subpoenas, by DR. KETAN MAYER-PATEL, PALTALK HOLDINGS, INC. Responses due by 7/11/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Subpoena to Testify, # 2 Subpoena to Produce) (Sheets, Jamie)
June 15, 2011 Receipt of Funds for Filing Fee in the amount of $ 39.00. Receipt No. NCM014930. (Sheets, Jamie)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PALTALK HOLDINGS, INC. v. SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PALTALK HOLDINGS, INC.
Represented By: JAMES CONRAD ADAMS, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA INC.
Represented By: BRUCE EDWARD OWENS, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NCSOFT CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SONY ONLINE ENTERTAINMENT, LLC
Represented By: BRUCE EDWARD OWENS, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SONY CORPORATION
Represented By: BRUCE EDWARD OWENS, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Represented By: BRUCE EDWARD OWENS, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ACTIVISION PUBLISHING, INC.
Represented By: BRUCE EDWARD OWENS, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.
Represented By: BRUCE EDWARD OWENS, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BLIZZARD ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
Represented By: BRUCE EDWARD OWENS, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant: DR. KETAN MAYER-PATEL
Represented By: JAMES CONRAD ADAMS, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?