LONG v. LANCASTER
Petitioner: RONNIE WALLACE LONG
Respondent: JENNIE LANCASTER
Case Number: 1:2012cv00119
Filed: February 3, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
County: Cabarrus
Presiding Judge: L. PATRICK AULD
Presiding Judge: CATHERINE C. EAGLES
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 8/2/2012, that for the foregoing reasons, Respondents' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 9 ) is GRANTED, Petitioner's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 25 ) is DENIED, and Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) is DISMISSED. (Lloyd, Donna)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LONG v. LANCASTER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: RONNIE WALLACE LONG
Represented By: NICHOLAS C. WOOMER-DETERS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: JENNIE LANCASTER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?