DAWLING v. SHAMROCK ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION
SCOTT M. DAWLING |
SHAMROCK ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION |
1:2012cv00198 |
February 28, 2012 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
NCMD Office |
Guilford |
UNASSIGNED |
L. PATRICK AULD |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 8/21/2012 adopting the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (doc. # 15 ); that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, for Summary Judgment (Doc. 10 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENI ED IN PART. The Court dismisses for lack of subject matter jurisdiction any race- or age- based discriminatory discharge claim. The Defendant's Motion is otherwise denied, and the Plaintiff's claims that Defendant engaged in race and ag e discrimination by transferring him from tank technician to a job with significantly different responsibilities are not dismissed and remain pending, without prejudice to a Motion for Summary Judgment after an appropriate time for discovery. (Lloyd, Donna) |
Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION, ORDER, AND RECOMMENDATION - MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 06/25/2012. IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry 10 ) be granted in part and denied in part, in that the Court should dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction any race- or age-based discriminatory discharge claim, but should neither dismiss nor enter summary judgment on Plaintiff's claims th at Defendant engaged in race and age discrimination by transferring him from tank technician to a job with significantly different responsibilities. IT IS ORDERED that, upon Defendant's filing of an Answer pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Pro cedure 12(a)(4)(A), the Clerk promptly shall set this case for an Initial Pretrial Conference. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to assist Plaintiff in meeting his obligation to prosecute this case, the Clerk shall send Plaintiff a copy of this Court's Local Rules of Civil Procedure and of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 26, 28, 29, 30, 31, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 41, 45, 56, and 72, as well as Forms 1, 2, 50, and 51.(Taylor, Abby) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: DAWLING v. SHAMROCK ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: SHAMROCK ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: SCOTT M. DAWLING | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.