UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 1900 LONGVIEW DRIVE, WINSTON-SALEM, FORSYTH COUNTY, NC, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE FORSYTH COUNTY REGISTRY OF DEEDS BOOK 2968, PAGE 2654, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit North Carolina Middle District UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 1900 LONGVIEW DRIVE, WINSTON-SALEM, FORSYTH COUNTY, NC, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE FORSYTH COUNTY REGISTRY OF DEEDS BOOK 2968, PAGE 2654, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON et al

Plaintiff:	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:	1900 LONGVIEW DRIVE, WINSTON-SALEM, FORSYTH COUNTY, NC, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE FORSYTH COUNTY REGISTRY OF DEEDS BOOK 2968, PAGE 2654, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON, 1301 BRETTON ST., WINSTON-SALEM, NC, FORSYTH COUNTY, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE FORSYTH COUNTY REGISTRY OF DEEDS BOOK 2989, PAGE 4211, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON, 1074 HEITMAN CT., WINSTON-SALEM, FORSYTH COUNTY, NC, FORMERLY KNOWN AS 950 CRANFORD ST., AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE FORSYTH COUNTY REGISTRY OF DEEDS BOOK 2989, PAGE 4214, WITH ALL APPURTENA, 1917 EAST 25TH ST., WINSTON-SALEM, FORSYTH COUNTY, NC, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE FORSYTH COUNTY REGISTRY OF DEEDS, BOOK 2991, PAGE 1729, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON, 808 MACEDONIA CT., HIGH POINT, GUILFORD COUNTY, NC, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE GUILFORD COUNTY REGISTRY OF DEEDS, BOOK 7044, PAGE 2470, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON and 810 MACEDONIA CT., HIGH POINT, GUILFORD COUNTY, NC, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE GUILFORD COUNTY REGISTRY OF DEEDS, BOOK 7044, PAGE 2470, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON
Case Number:	1:2012cv00471
Filed:	May 11, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office:	NCMD Office
County:	Forsyth
Presiding Judge:	UNASSIGNED
Presiding Judge:	JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE
Nature of Suit:	Drug Related Seizure of Property
Cause of Action:	21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Jury Demanded By:	None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 1900 LONGVIEW DRIVE, WINSTON-SALEM, FORSYTH COUNTY, NC, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE FORSYTH COUNTY REGISTRY OF DEEDS BOOK 2968, PAGE 2654, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By:	LYNNE P. KLAUER
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: 1900 LONGVIEW DRIVE, WINSTON-SALEM, FORSYTH COUNTY, NC, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE FORSYTH COUNTY REGISTRY OF DEEDS BOOK 2968, PAGE 2654, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: 1301 BRETTON ST., WINSTON-SALEM, NC, FORSYTH COUNTY, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE FORSYTH COUNTY REGISTRY OF DEEDS BOOK 2989, PAGE 4211, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: 1074 HEITMAN CT., WINSTON-SALEM, FORSYTH COUNTY, NC, FORMERLY KNOWN AS 950 CRANFORD ST., AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE FORSYTH COUNTY REGISTRY OF DEEDS BOOK 2989, PAGE 4214, WITH ALL APPURTENA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: 1917 EAST 25TH ST., WINSTON-SALEM, FORSYTH COUNTY, NC, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE FORSYTH COUNTY REGISTRY OF DEEDS, BOOK 2991, PAGE 1729, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: 808 MACEDONIA CT., HIGH POINT, GUILFORD COUNTY, NC, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE GUILFORD COUNTY REGISTRY OF DEEDS, BOOK 7044, PAGE 2470, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: 810 MACEDONIA CT., HIGH POINT, GUILFORD COUNTY, NC, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED IN THE GUILFORD COUNTY REGISTRY OF DEEDS, BOOK 7044, PAGE 2470, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?