UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. BAYER A.G. et al
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JUAN N. WALTERSPIEL, M.D. |
| BAYER A.G., QUINTILES TRANSNATIONAL CORP., JOHN DOE, JOE DOE and JANE DOE |
| 1:2012cv00773 |
| July 26, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| UNASSIGNED |
| L. PATRICK AULD |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
MEMEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE on 12/19/2014; that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Quintiles [Doc. # 72 ] be granted, and that all claims against Defendant Qu intiles (Counts 1-3) be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). FURTHER that all claims against Defendant Bayer and the Doe Defendants be dismissed without prejudice for failure to timely serve process, and that this action be dismissed. (Sheets, Jamie)
|
|
Filing
61
CLOSED TRANSFER - The Court concludes that the applicable factors weigh in favor of transferring this action to the Middle District of North Carolina. The Clerk is directed to TRANSFER this action to that district court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Any previously ordered dates and deadlines are VACATED and any pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/25/2012. (JKS) [Transferred from Indiana Southern on 7/26/2012.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
