MANEY v. FEALY et al
| CHRISTOPHER LAWRENCE MANEY |
| CHIEF JAMES FEALY, OFFICER TERENCE GARRISON and THE CITY OF HIGH POINT |
| 1:2012cv00800 |
| July 31, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Guilford |
| JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE |
| JAMES A. BEATY |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR on 11/17/2014; that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED and this matter is hereby DISMISSED. A Judgment consistent with this Memorandum Opinion and Order will be filed contemporaneously herewith. (Sheets, Jamie)
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR on 7/18/2013. ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 8 ] is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against the City of High Point and against Chief James Fealy and Officer Terence Garrison in their official capacities, Plaintiff's state law battery and negligent training and supervision claims against the City of High Point and against Chief James Fealy and Officer Terence Garrison in th eir official capacities, Plaintiff's state law negligent training and supervision claim against Chief James Fealy in his individual capacity, and Plaintiffs alternative claims under the North Carolina Constitution are hereby DISMISSED. (Butler, Carol)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
