BROWN et al v. PENN NATIONAL SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY
TIFFANY WILMOUTH, DELORIS BROWN and JEREMY BROWN |
PENN NATIONAL SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY |
1:2012cv01204 |
November 9, 2012 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
NCMD Office |
Surry |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 MEMORANDUM ORDER. Signed by JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER on 3/17/2014, that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is ADOPTED as modified herein, and that Penn National's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 19 ) is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs' claim for coverage under the Policy but is DENIED as to coverage under the Act. (Daniel, J) |
Filing 28 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER signed on 1/28/2014. For the foregoing reasons, this Court finds that there is genuine issue of material fact as to whether Defendant has a duty and obligation und er NCFRA to provide benefits and coverage for any injuries sustained by Plaintiff on 6/3/2012. The Court finds that there is no genuine issue of material fact as to whether coverage exists pursuant to Policy terms because Mrs. Ferguson was not an &qu ot;insured" as defined by the Policy. Accordingly, the Court RECOMMENDS that Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry 19 ) be GRANTED IN PART as to coverage under the Policy, and DENIED IN PART as to claims under the NCFRA. (Daniel, J) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.