SIMMS v. BALL STREET VENTURES, LLC et al
Plaintiff: BRYAN H. SIMMS
Defendant: BALL STREET FUND, LLC, CHRISTIAN LAETTNER, BRIAN K. DAVIS, BALL STREET PARTNERS. LLC and BALL STREET VENTURES, LLC
Case Number: 1:2012mc00001
Filed: January 6, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
Presiding Judge: UNASSIGNED
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 10/5/2012, that Plaintiff's Motion to Allow Conventional Filing (Docket Entry 3 ) is GRANTED IN PART in that Attorney Charles R. Hassell, Jr. may file documents in this case i n paper form through December 31, 2012, further that Plaintiff's Application for Charging Order (Docket Entry 4 ) is GRANTED and, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69(a)(1) and Section 57C-5-03 of the North Carolina General Statutes, National Champion Real Estate, LLC; BDVII, LLC; BDV III, LLC; Fuller Street Development, LLC; Durham Basketball Team, LLC; FSD Master Tenant, LLC; L8, LLC; Walker CST, LLC; and West Village Condo Partnership, LLC shall direct any distributions with r espect to Brian K. Davis's membership interests to Plaintiff in the amount of $667,846.90, plus post-judgment interest at the applicable legal rate, further that Plaintiff's Motion for Writ of Garnishment (Docket Entry 5 ) is DENIED, but without prejudice to Plaintiff filing another such (or similar) motion, along with a supporting brief that sets out authority for the requested relief and (if necessary) any required affidavit. (Israel, Lisa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SIMMS v. BALL STREET VENTURES, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BALL STREET FUND, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHRISTIAN LAETTNER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRIAN K. DAVIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BALL STREET PARTNERS. LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BALL STREET VENTURES, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BRYAN H. SIMMS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?