HILL v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC. et al
| ARTHUR HILL |
| EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC., KEASHA ANN BROUSSARD and KING & SPALDING, LLP |
| 1:2013cv00153 |
| February 21, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Cabarrus |
| L. PATRICK AULD |
| WILLIAM L. OSTEEN |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 9/26/2014; that Plaintiff's Motion to Substitute Party Defendant (Docket Entry 67 ) is GRANTED and that FIA Card Services, N.A. replace Defendant Bank of America. The C lerk is directed to modify the Caption of this case to reflect the substitution. FURTHER that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend and Join Allstate as Party Defendant (Docket Entry 68 ) and Motion to Substitute His Proposed Third Amended Complaint (Docket Entry 73 ) are DENIED. (Sheets, Jamie)
|
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 12/03/2013; that: 1. Dell's motion to strike the Second Amended Complaint, (Doc. 40 ), is DENIED and the Court deems the Second Amended Complaint filed nunc pro tunc. 2. Dell's motion to dismiss Mr. Hill's claims with prejudice, (Doc. 40 ), is GRANTED. (Garland, Leah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
