MONROE et al v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY

Plaintiff: JANE MILLER MONROE and S. THOMAS MONROE
Defendant: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Case Number: 1:2013cv00157
Filed: February 22, 2013
Court: North Carolina Middle District Court
Office: NCMD Office
County: Alamance
Referring Judge: L. PATRICK AULD
Presiding Judge: THOMAS D. SCHROEDER
Nature of Suit: P.I. : Asbestos
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MONROE et al v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JANE MILLER MONROE
Represented By: WILLIAM MARC GRAHAM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: S. THOMAS MONROE
Represented By: WILLIAM MARC GRAHAM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Represented By: JOHN S. BUFORD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?