BAYER CROPSCIENCE INC. et al v. SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC
| BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP and BAYER CROPSCIENCE INC. |
| SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC |
| 1:2013cv00316 |
| April 16, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Durham |
| JOE L. WEBSTER |
| N. C. TILLEY |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 10/17/2013; that: 1. Bayer's motion to seal the Welge declaration, (Doc. 11 ), is GRANTED. Bayer shall file the unredacted declaration under seal, and the Clerk sha ll maintain it under seal. 2. Bayer's motion to seal its reply brief, (Doc. 39 ), and Syngenta's motion to seal the first Reasons declaration and accompanying exhibits, (Doc. 27 ), are GRANTED. The Clerk will maintain those doc uments, (Docs. 25 , 38 ), under seal. 3. Syngenta's motion to seal the second Reasons declaration, the James declaration, and accompanying exhibits, (Doc. 51 ), is GRANTED as to the second Reasons declaration and DENIED as to the James declaration. The Clerk shall maintain the second Reasons declaration, (Doc. 53 ), under seal. 4. The James declaration, (Doc. 55 ), shall remain under seal pending further order. No later than ten days from the date of this Order, Syn genta may file on the public record the James declaration, (Doc. 55 ), in redacted form, an amended motion to be allowed to file the unredacted declaration and exhibit under seal, such evidentiary support as may be appropriate, and a short brief in support. (Garland, Leah)
|
|
Filing
69
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 10/09/2013; that 1. Bayer's motion to seal the Welge declaration, (Doc. 11 ), is DENIED as moot. 2. Bayer's motion to seal its reply brief, (Doc. 39 ), and Synge nta's motion to seal the first Reasons declaration and accompanying exhibits, (Doc. 27 ), are GRANTED. The Clerk will maintain those documents, (Docs. 25 , 38 ), under seal. 3. Syngenta's motion to seal the second Reasons decla ration, the James declaration, and accompanying exhibits, (Doc. 51 ), is GRANTED as to the second Reasons declaration and DENIED as to the James declaration. The Clerk shall maintain the second Reasons declaration, (Doc. 53 ), under seal. 4. The James declaration, (Doc. 55 ), shall remain under seal pending further order. No later than ten days from the date of this Order, Syngenta may file on the public record the James declaration, (Doc. 55 ), in redacted form, an amended motion to be allowed to file the unredacted declaration and exhibit under seal, such evidentiary support as may be appropriate, and a short brief in support. (Garland, Leah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
