BAYER CROPSCIENCE INC. et al v. SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC
Plaintiff: |
BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP and BAYER CROPSCIENCE INC. |
Defendant: |
SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC |
Case Number: |
1:2013cv00316 |
Filed: |
April 16, 2013 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
Office: |
NCMD Office |
County: |
Durham |
Presiding Judge: |
JOE L. WEBSTER |
Presiding Judge: |
N. C. TILLEY |
Nature of Suit: |
Patent |
Cause of Action: |
15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
October 17, 2013 |
Filing
70
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 10/17/2013; that: 1. Bayer's motion to seal the Welge declaration, (Doc. 11 ), is GRANTED. Bayer shall file the unredacted declaration under seal, and the Clerk sha ll maintain it under seal. 2. Bayer's motion to seal its reply brief, (Doc. 39 ), and Syngenta's motion to seal the first Reasons declaration and accompanying exhibits, (Doc. 27 ), are GRANTED. The Clerk will maintain those doc uments, (Docs. 25 , 38 ), under seal. 3. Syngenta's motion to seal the second Reasons declaration, the James declaration, and accompanying exhibits, (Doc. 51 ), is GRANTED as to the second Reasons declaration and DENIED as to the James declaration. The Clerk shall maintain the second Reasons declaration, (Doc. 53 ), under seal. 4. The James declaration, (Doc. 55 ), shall remain under seal pending further order. No later than ten days from the date of this Order, Syn genta may file on the public record the James declaration, (Doc. 55 ), in redacted form, an amended motion to be allowed to file the unredacted declaration and exhibit under seal, such evidentiary support as may be appropriate, and a short brief in support. (Garland, Leah)
|
October 9, 2013 |
Filing
69
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 10/09/2013; that 1. Bayer's motion to seal the Welge declaration, (Doc. 11 ), is DENIED as moot. 2. Bayer's motion to seal its reply brief, (Doc. 39 ), and Synge nta's motion to seal the first Reasons declaration and accompanying exhibits, (Doc. 27 ), are GRANTED. The Clerk will maintain those documents, (Docs. 25 , 38 ), under seal. 3. Syngenta's motion to seal the second Reasons decla ration, the James declaration, and accompanying exhibits, (Doc. 51 ), is GRANTED as to the second Reasons declaration and DENIED as to the James declaration. The Clerk shall maintain the second Reasons declaration, (Doc. 53 ), under seal. 4. The James declaration, (Doc. 55 ), shall remain under seal pending further order. No later than ten days from the date of this Order, Syngenta may file on the public record the James declaration, (Doc. 55 ), in redacted form, an amended motion to be allowed to file the unredacted declaration and exhibit under seal, such evidentiary support as may be appropriate, and a short brief in support. (Garland, Leah)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?