WILDS v. COLVIN
| SHEILA WILDS |
| CAROLYN W. COLVIN |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 1:2013cv00318 |
| April 17, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Durham |
| JOE L. WEBSTER |
| JAMES A. BEATY |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 206 Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR on 03/09/2015, that the court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, and that the Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings [Docket No. 12 ] is DENIED, that the Defendants motion for judgment on the pleadings [Docket No. 16 ] is GRANTED, and that the final decisions of the Commissioner be upheld. A Judgment dismissing this action will be enteredcontemporaneously with this Order. (Taylor, Abby)
|
|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 01/23/2015. After a careful consideration of the evidence of record, the Court finds that the Commissioner's decision is supp orted by substantial evidence. Accordingly, this Court RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket Entry 12 ) be DENIED, Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket Entry 16 ) be GRANTED, and the final decision of the Commissioner be upheld.(Taylor, Abby)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
