FORDHAM v. KELLER et al
CHRIS FORDHAM |
ALVIN KELLER, JR., KIERAN SHANNAHAN, JOEL HERRON, GARY CRUTCHFIELD, NEAL LEAKEZ, CHANDRA RANSON, BARNES, STARR and CHAVIS |
1:2013cv00617 |
July 25, 2013 |
US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
NCMD Office |
Scotland |
JOE L. WEBSTER |
JAMES A. BEATY |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 96 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 12/11/2017. For the reasons stated herein, IT IS RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's motion to alter or amend pursuant to Rule 59 (e) (Docket Entry 87 ) be DENIED. FURTHER that to the extent Plaintiff seeks to file a supplemental Rule 59(e) motion, his motion (Docket Entry 94 ) be DENIED. To the extent requested, Plaintiff's filing should be construed as a notice of appeal. FURTHER that Plaintiff's motion to file a late notice of appeal (Docket Entry 95 ) be DENIED as moot.(Taylor, Abby) |
Filing 77 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR on 03/20/2017, that Defendants Gary Crutchfield, Neal Leakez, Chandra Ransom and Lisa Starr's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, or in the alternative, for Summary Judgment ( Docket Entry 68 ) is GRANTED. As to all unserved Defendants, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. To the extent Plaintiff's letter document (Docket Entry 75 ) is construed as a motion for an extension of time and a motion for reconsideration, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this motion is denied.(Taylor, Abby) |
Filing 51 ORDER signed by JUDGE JAMES A. BEATY, JR on 03/31/2015, that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. # 49 ] is therefore affirmed and adopted for the reasons set forth therein. ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss [Doc. # 21 ] filed by Defendants Gary Crutchfield, Chandra Ranson, and Neal Leakez and joined in by Defendants Lisa Starr and Daniel Barnes [Doc. # 32 & # 33 ] is DENIED, and the Motion to Dismiss [Doc.# 34 ] filed by Defendant Daniel Barnes, pertaining to only himself, is GRANTED. (Taylor, Abby) |
Filing 49 ORDER, MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 03/12/2015. For the reasons stated herein, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the Defendants Crutchfield, Ranson, Leakez, Starr and Barnes' Motion to Dismiss (Docket Entry 21 ) be DENIED, and Defendant Barnes' Motion to Dismiss (Docket Entry 34 ) be GRANTED. FURTHERMORE, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (Docket Entry 43 ) is DENIED.(Taylor, Abby) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.